Ocean
{
Height 9
Hapke 0
SpotBright 2
SpotWidth 0.20
DayAmbient 2
Composition
{
H2O 97
NaCI 1
}
}
Moon "Name"
{
MassMoon 1.3
DistKm 140443
}
Otherwise, instead of DistKm, I think that SemiMajorAxisKm it is best suited. After also do with MassJupiter, the mass of the object in Jupiter's mass and otherwise MassKg, the mass of the object in kilogram. Also can be done with the radius.I have 2 ideas:
Add MassMoon parameter for the moons, this is the mass of the object in Moon masses,
Add DistKm parameter for moons, this is the distance from its parent object in kilometers|DOT|
Example:Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 DistKm 140443 }
Planet "Jupya"
{
ParentBody "Stellya"
Class "GasGiant"
MassJupiter 1.73
RadJupiter 1.73 //or RadiusJupiter
Orbit
{
SemiMajorAxis 0.74 //AU
}
}
Moon "Jupya 1"
{
ParentBody "Jupya"
Class "Selena"
MassMoon 4.27
RadMoon 2.62 //or RadiusMoon
Orbit
{
SemiMajorAxisKm 745213.22
}
}
DwarfMoon "Jupya D1"
{
ParentBody "Jupya"
Class "Asteroid"
MassKg 4.23e+17
Radius 4.37
Orbit
{
SemiMajorAxisKm 842629.69
}
}
Okay, but SemiMajorAxisKm maybe too long, I think, the DistKm is better[DOT] What do you think about MassMoon?Otherwise, instead of DistKm, I think that SemiMajorAxisKm it is best suited. After also do with MassJupiter, the mass of the object in Jupiter's mass and otherwise MassKg, the mass of the object in kilogram. Also can be done with the radius.I have 2 ideas:
Add MassMoon parameter for the moons, this is the mass of the object in Moon masses,
Add DistKm parameter for moons, this is the distance from its parent object in kilometers|DOT|
Example:Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 DistKm 140443 }
Example :Code: Select allPlanet "Jupya" { ParentBody "Stellya" Class "GasGiant" MassJupiter 1.73 RadJupiter 1.73 //or RadiusJupiter Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 0.74 //AU } } Moon "Jupya 1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Selena" MassMoon 4.27 RadMoon 2.62 //or RadiusMoon Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 745213.22 } } DwarfMoon "Jupya D1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Asteroid" MassKg 4.23e+17 Radius 4.37 Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 842629.69 } }
Else, SemiMajorAxis in "faster" SMA and for SemiMajorAxisKm SMAKm and you idea about MassMoon is good and I have use in my example.Okay, but SemiMajorAxisKm maybe too long, I think, the DistKm is better[DOT] What do you think about MassMoon?Otherwise, instead of DistKm, I think that SemiMajorAxisKm it is best suited. After also do with MassJupiter, the mass of the object in Jupiter's mass and otherwise MassKg, the mass of the object in kilogram. Also can be done with the radius.I have 2 ideas:
Add MassMoon parameter for the moons, this is the mass of the object in Moon masses,
Add DistKm parameter for moons, this is the distance from its parent object in kilometers|DOT|
Example:Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 DistKm 140443 }
Example :Code: Select allPlanet "Jupya" { ParentBody "Stellya" Class "GasGiant" MassJupiter 1.73 RadJupiter 1.73 //or RadiusJupiter Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 0.74 //AU } } Moon "Jupya 1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Selena" MassMoon 4.27 RadMoon 2.62 //or RadiusMoon Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 745213.22 } } DwarfMoon "Jupya D1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Asteroid" MassKg 4.23e+17 Radius 4.37 Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 842629.69 } }
I'm inclined to think it would even be called Lunar Mass ("LunarMass"). No?I have 2 ideas:
Add MassMoon parameter for the moons, this is the mass of the object in Moon masses,
Add DistKm parameter for moons, this is the distance from its parent object in kilometers|DOT|
Example:Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 DistKm 140443 }
Moon "Name"
{
MassLuna 1.3
SemiMajorAxis 140443
}
MassMoon is better[DOT] I want that my ideas for SE be in SEI'm inclined to think it would even be called Lunar Mass ("LunarMass"). No?I have 2 ideas:
Add MassMoon parameter for the moons, this is the mass of the object in Moon masses,
Add DistKm parameter for moons, this is the distance from its parent object in kilometers|DOT|
Example:Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 DistKm 140443 }
I want MassMoon, I think it is betterMaybe MassLuna then?since that's how it's already been written and I don't see why satellites should get special treatment in orbit.Code: Select allMoon "Name" { MassMoon 1.3 SemiMajorAxis 140443 }
I'm thinking geological factors like plate tectonics would be nice, although I'm pretty sure it'll be quite tricky to implement and it probably doesn't do much visually.
Ok, SMAKm can be used, RadMoon parameter is also goodElse, SemiMajorAxis in "faster" SMA and for SemiMajorAxisKm SMAKm and you idea about MassMoon is good and I have use in my example.Okay, but SemiMajorAxisKm maybe too long, I think, the DistKm is better[DOT] What do you think about MassMoon?Otherwise, instead of DistKm, I think that SemiMajorAxisKm it is best suited. After also do with MassJupiter, the mass of the object in Jupiter's mass and otherwise MassKg, the mass of the object in kilogram. Also can be done with the radius.
Example :Code: Select allPlanet "Jupya" { ParentBody "Stellya" Class "GasGiant" MassJupiter 1.73 RadJupiter 1.73 //or RadiusJupiter Orbit { SemiMajorAxis 0.74 //AU } } Moon "Jupya 1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Selena" MassMoon 4.27 RadMoon 2.62 //or RadiusMoon Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 745213.22 } } DwarfMoon "Jupya D1" { ParentBody "Jupya" Class "Asteroid" MassKg 4.23e+17 Radius 4.37 Orbit { SemiMajorAxisKm 842629.69 } }