You only need luminance for RGB shots! You can't see the nebulosity with luminance as it doesn't cut out light pollution.Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
Oh, thats a good point, but I also heard you can use a regular light pollution filter or (better) an imaging light pollution filter (which corrects the white balance) for the luminance channel. I wonder if that does anything for narrowband imaging?You only need luminance for RGB shots! You can't see the nebulosity with luminance as it doesn't cut out light pollution.Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
LP filters as luminance can help immensely for normal LRGB composites, but for narrowband it does more harm than good. The signal is nowhere near as close as narrowband. You can also use the Ha filter as luminance and make sweet HaRGB composites.Oh, thats a good point, but I also heard you can use a regular light pollution filter or (better) an imaging light pollution filter (which corrects the white balance) for the luminance channel. I wonder if that does anything for narrowband imaging?You only need luminance for RGB shots! You can't see the nebulosity with luminance as it doesn't cut out light pollution.Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
Yup, bortle 8. Light pollution is visible to the naked eye without taking long exposures. It's pretty bad, which is why I went narrowband.omg and this is in a light polluted area?
I will, but right now I need a lot more experience with post processing. Just switched to PixInsight so I'm completely new to the processing methods. I gave the SHO palette a try nonetheless...There's a site called astrobin you should start a collection on there
Untracked? Holy ***.A quiet, beautiful night under the stars in the North Cascades, with the Canon Rebel T3 and a tripod.
Same, I live right in the middle of most polluted sky area of Italy. Luckily there are a few mountains around and there the sky is acceptable, but not enough for seeing the Milky Way though.Wow.
I really wish I had darker skies.
Wow, untracked? The longest exposures I can do with the stars still appearing like points is 15 seconds, which coincidentally, seems to be about the longest I can do without light pollution becoming prevalent (and still preserving star colors.)Wow.
I really wish I had darker skies. That looks amazing. I've never even seen the milky way in my life. Darkest skies I've ever been under and actually looked up was somewhere around Bortle 6. I've been in a Bortle 1 area a few years ago during a camping trip, but I was too tired to look up and went straight to sleepMany regrets.
Untracked? Holy ***.A quiet, beautiful night under the stars in the North Cascades, with the Canon Rebel T3 and a tripod.
I'd be against using some automatic tool like Sequator. I've tried it myself and it kinda works, but I found that I get better results by just removing LP manually.There's a free tool to remove light pollution called Sequator, you should try it!