Ultimate space simulation software
SpaceEngineer wrote:Salvo wrote:Source of the post Whaat? This are huge news! Did you already start working on it or it is such an easy implementation that it can be ready in just a month?
It could take less than a week, there are plenty of free astronomical code libraries exist for this.
I hope to see the update very soon !
SpaceEngineer wrote:Old classes could be useful in scripts, for a backward compatibility. Engine can easily automatically translate old classes to the new ones, for example desert -> desertic rocky terra.
Fireinthehole wrote:Druidpc wrote:Do we have an estimated release date for this update? I'm hyped!
No.Quarior wrote:SpaceEngineer wrote:Source of the post I planning to implement VSOP87/DE403 soon, and maybe release a quick patch for 0.980 with this feature only. Before the total solar eclipse in August.
Nice but when and where total solar eclipse in August ?
21st of August, visible in (only) the mainland USA.
Thanks. I'm kinda let down.
SpaceEngineer wrote:News about development now will be in a form of blog. This thread is for discussion.
)
PlutonianEmpire wrote:Source of the post Maybe one way to filter barycenters from the SS explorer would be to exclude barycenter points that go below a planet's surface for any amount of time (maybe radius + bumpheight for example) from being classified as a binary?
problemecium wrote:The Sun's and Jupiter's barycenter is outside the Sun? I never would have guessed considering their relative masses o_O
XBrain130 wrote:Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets
HarbingerDawn wrote:XBrain130 wrote:Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets
Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?
HarbingerDawn wrote:XBrain130 wrote:Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets
Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?
