Ultimate space simulation software

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 82
 
User avatar
jadestar
Space Tourist
Space Tourist
Posts: 24
Joined: 01 Dec 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, WA - USA

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

09 Dec 2016 09:07

SpaceEngineer wrote:
Source of the post The new version will have ability to run a script passed through a command line. So you may make a .bat file or edit SE shortcut. This also means that you can associate SpaceEngine.exe with the script file extension and "run scripts" by double-clicking on them.

Awesome!! I've looked forward to this for as long as I have known about SpaceEngine. (like 0.9.6).
My specs:
Rig #1 MSI Z370 GAMING - CPU i7-8700k, RAM 32gb, GPU Nvidia 1080ti 11GB VRAM
Rig #2 Gigabyte X99-UD4 - CPU E5-2658V3, RAM 32gb, GPU AMD RX480 8GB VRAM
 
rochelimit
Observer
Observer
Posts: 1
Joined: 10 Dec 2016

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

10 Dec 2016 07:30

Depiction of Pan and Atlas (moons of Saturn) is not accurate. They are supposedly shaped like a "flying saucer", not a random asteroid. There are already images of Pan and Atlas. Please fix this!
 
User avatar
Hornblower
Pioneer
Pioneer
Posts: 594
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Location: Gale Crater
Contact:

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

10 Dec 2016 07:32

rochelimit wrote:
Depiction of Pan and Atlas (moons of Saturn) is not accurate. They are supposedly shaped like a "flying saucer", not a random asteroid. There are already images of Pan and Atlas. Please fix this!

We'd better wait until we have better images. Cassini is going to be getting close to them soon, so we'll get some better quality. Then we could try to make Pan and Atlas
"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - Douglas Adams
 
AidanTBM
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 10 Dec 2016

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

10 Dec 2016 07:42

In the next update I want if you speed things up stars to die and be born hot jupiters to eventually lose all their mass and volcanoes to erupt and stop erupting, and mac support
 
User avatar
HarbingerDawn
SE Team Member
SE Team Member
Posts: 628
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Location: CT, USA
Contact:

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

10 Dec 2016 09:22

AidanTBM wrote:
In the next update I want if you speed things up stars to die and be born hot jupiters to eventually lose all their mass and volcanoes to erupt and stop erupting, and mac support

And in the next update I'd like SE to solve all environmental crises, cure all diseases, and end world poverty, but it isn't going to happen :roll:
Ryzen 7 3700X, 64 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB VRAM
Posts on old forum: 8717
 
User avatar
Mosfet
Star Engineer
Star Engineer
Posts: 1399
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Location: Italy
Contact:

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

11 Dec 2016 12:45

rochelimit wrote:
Source of the post They are supposedly shaped like a "flying saucer", not a random asteroid

There are many asteroids with a peculiar shape that we know of, as well as many comets, yet it's not so simple to achieve what you ask with current version of SpaceEngine. SpaceEngineer and others are working on it, and it will be fixed at due time.
For now, given the "saucer" shape, we can only use the Oblateness value published in papers and other archives, and perhaps a bit of customization via the integrated SE editor.
"Time is illusion. Lunchtime doubly so". Douglas N. Adams
My mods | My specs: Asus x555ub - cpu i5-6200u, ram 4gb, gpu nvidia geforce 940m 2gb vram | IRC freenode.net canale ##SpaceEngineITA
 
User avatar
XBrain130
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 285
Joined: 26 Nov 2016
Location: Italy
Contact:

Auto-Synchronizing Time

12 Dec 2016 04:10

Would it be possible adding the option of making SE automatically synchronizing to current time upon start-up? Even if it takes 2 seconds, having to press the "set current time" button every time I open the game is a bit annoying.
SpaceEngine's Italian Discord server: https://discord.gg/NhQbEbC
 
User avatar
mrwallace888
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 Dec 2016

Astronaut System

12 Dec 2016 18:06

Basically it makes it so you can have an avatar astronaut player guy that you can control and walk on surfaces of planets and asteroids (maybe have a jet-pack for small maneuvers). And then if you walk up to a ship you can press a key or click on it to get in and control it!

What do you think?
 
User avatar
mrwallace888
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 Dec 2016

Cities and Roads for Planets like Earth

12 Dec 2016 18:07

Cities and Roads for Planets like Earth

It would be nice if that was for the city lights, so it's an actual city. Plus, I can land in Manhattan if I wanted to.
 
User avatar
mrwallace888
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 Dec 2016

Proper Ship Landing System

12 Dec 2016 18:10

When your ship uses Autopilot to land, it's kind of annoying when it literally crashes into the surface at full speed. That's not a landing. I want a proper landing system so that the ship slows down, faces the horizon, and lowers itself slowing onto the ground.
 
User avatar
Hornblower
Pioneer
Pioneer
Posts: 594
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Location: Gale Crater
Contact:

Cities and Roads for Planets like Earth

12 Dec 2016 19:09

Not unless it's procedural. If you wanted to download the entire earth at the resolution of google earth, you'd better be prepared to use Terabits of storage :)
"Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space." - Douglas Adams
 
User avatar
Ostarisk
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 47
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Location: Mimas Crater Base

Astronaut System

12 Dec 2016 19:31

mrwallace888, Why are you creating new threads when there already is a suggestion thread for suggestions?

Anyways, I like the idea, and several modders have attemped to create such a thing. It would be nice to have an astronaut avatar to walk around the surface of a planet, but as Space Engine creator once said:
SpaceEngineer wrote:
As long as the object exists and is confirmed to be real, then it certainly WILL be implemented into the game.
My Mods(Old Forum)
My Mods(New Forum)
"I think of space not as the final frontier but as the next frontier. Not as something to be conquered but as to be explored." - Neil Degrasse Tyson
 
User avatar
Ostarisk
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 47
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Location: Mimas Crater Base

Cities and Roads for Planets like Earth

12 Dec 2016 19:36

mrwallace888 wrote:
Source of the post It would be nice if that was for the city lights, so it's an actual city. Plus, I can land in Manhattan if I wanted to.


Not that I'm against the idea of it, but I think the title you chose for this thread is probably a bit ambiguous. Why? Advanced civilizations would probably no longer need to have roads, if they are advanced enough. Also, If you want to see the buildings as well, you'd need a pretty huge computer to see an entire city in the game without having it crash.
My Mods(Old Forum)
My Mods(New Forum)
"I think of space not as the final frontier but as the next frontier. Not as something to be conquered but as to be explored." - Neil Degrasse Tyson
 
User avatar
Ostarisk
Astronaut
Astronaut
Posts: 47
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Location: Mimas Crater Base

Proper Ship Landing System

12 Dec 2016 19:40

mrwallace888 wrote:
Source of the post When your ship uses Autopilot to land, it's kind of annoying when it literally crashes into the surface at full speed. That's not a landing. I want a proper landing system so that the ship slows down, faces the horizon, and lowers itself slowing onto the ground.

Again, why are you not posting your suggestions in the general suggestions thread? We your suggestions to be posted in mentioned thread to keep the forum nice and tidy. Anyways, which autopilot are you referring to? Flight assist, or, the automatic 'fly to' button? There is no action that automatically 'lands' your spacecraft on the surface.
My Mods(Old Forum)
My Mods(New Forum)
"I think of space not as the final frontier but as the next frontier. Not as something to be conquered but as to be explored." - Neil Degrasse Tyson
 
User avatar
N0B0DY
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 254
Joined: 09 Dec 2016

General suggestions for SpaceEngine

12 Dec 2016 23:48

ED supercruise flight mode but extrapolated for interstellar and intergalactic flight. I know it is not scientifically accurate and not suggesting it for the main game but for planetarium exploration with Spacecraft it would be cool I think. Here is how I think of it:
1. Near surface / inside atmosphere - disabled obviously
2. Near planet orbit - disabled probably
3. Medium / high orbit - enabled and limited to sub-luminal velocities e.g. from 30km/sec up to 1c (depending on distance and strength of gravity source)
4. Interplanetary travel within system: Superluminal 1c up to 1000c
5. Interstellar travel: 1000c (or 1kc) and up to 1Mc
6 Intergalactic: 1Mc to 1Gc

Speed will be restricted by gravity field similar to how you travel in ED (ok if you haven;t played ED you wouldn't know what I am talking about :) ). In ED max speed is limited by gravity of star system bodies. The larger bodies (i.e. stellar mass bodies) have a longer but smoother effect at much higher distances whereas smaller bodies i.e planets have a shorter but stronger effect over smaller distances.
If you keep your warp throttle within 10% - 70/75%, it auto adjusts the speed as you approach gravity sources and you don't crash on them violently. Ok you don';t crash on them even when throttle at 100% but you exit supercruise violently upon hitting a barrier gravity wall, thereby damaging your ship.
 If you move really really far away from star system, speed caps at 2000c. In SE it can continue to increase depending on local stars gravity. Within our stellar neighbor it would be around 1kc-1mc. If you fly close to the core / dense areas of galaxy it should hardly reach 1Mc. If you start moving away from the galaxy / or galactic plane where star density diminishes, you could fly > 1Megac and as you get even further into intergalactic space it can go to a max of 1 Gc (one giga c or 1 billion times the speed of light).

I know it is not realistic but it would really help when trying to explore the universe with a spacecraft. Also I have proposed this in the old forum so I am sorry for repeating it here.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 82

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest