Ultimate space simulation software

  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
 
User avatar
SpaceEngineer
Author of SpaceEngine
Author of SpaceEngine
Topic Author
Posts: 505
Joined: 17 May 2016
Location: Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Patch 0.9.8.0e

21 Nov 2017 13:49

It is not, in a valid time frame of the orbital solution model (years 1550 to 2650).
 
User avatar
Mouthwash
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 156
Joined: 22 May 2017

Patch 0.9.8.0e

21 Nov 2017 23:34

SpaceEngineer wrote:
It is not, in a valid time frame of the orbital solution model (years 1550 to 2650).

I don't see any change whatsoever in Mercury's orbit even if I run max speed. Which is strange, because before the ephemerides patch, the perihelion and aphelion rotated around the sun at regular intervals. Which is the accurate one?
 
User avatar
SpaceEngineer
Author of SpaceEngine
Author of SpaceEngine
Topic Author
Posts: 505
Joined: 17 May 2016
Location: Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 00:03

Look more carefully. Rotation rate is just 9,5 arcminutes per century, ie on a valid time span of the DE436 model (1000 years) it rotates for just 1,5°
 
User avatar
Mouthwash
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 156
Joined: 22 May 2017

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 01:32

SpaceEngineer wrote:
Look more carefully. Rotation rate is just 9,5 arcminutes per century, ie on a valid time span of the DE436 model (1000 years) it rotates for just 1,5°

I don't understand what you're saying. It's two million CE and the orbit hasn't visibly budged at all. I remember that at max speed (prepatch) it made a full rotation almost every second.
 
User avatar
HarbingerDawn
SE Team Member
SE Team Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Location: CT, USA
Contact:

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 03:21

Mouthwash wrote:
Source of the post I don't understand what you're saying. It's two million CE and the orbit hasn't visibly budged at all. I remember that at max speed (prepatch) it made a full rotation almost every second.

The DE436 ephemeris has a valid time span of 1100 years total (1550-2650). Outside of that span, you will not see the effects you're looking for.
Ryzen 7 1700 OC to 3.8 GHz, 32 GB DDR4 RAM, GTX 980 Ti 6144 MB VRAM
Posts on old forum: 8717
 
User avatar
FastFourierTransform
Space Pilot
Space Pilot
Posts: 140
Joined: 17 Nov 2016

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 03:31

Mouthwash, we have talked about this in this thread long before (and also in the Work in progress thread):


FastFourierTransform:Source of the post I've just saw the precession of Mercury's perihelion. It's beautifull. But the problem is that it uses the DE436 theory that goes from the year 1550 to the year 2560. After that it imediatelly stops. If VSOP87 is also implemented and has unlimited timespan, why we can't see further evolution of Mercury's orbit?


FastFourierTransform:Source of the post Precession of Mercury's perihelion: I saw it in SE and looks great, but only occurs from the year 1550 to the 2560. Considering this is a more or less periodic phenomena could you make the timespan for the precession bigger? In that way we could see further evolution of Mercury's orbit. It's a very small angle now and If one has to explain it to people they are not going to clearly see it if it is not with longer duration.


SpaceEngineer:Source of the post JPL ephemeris does not calculate that value directly, so it cannot be extrapolated above the end points of the simulation.
 
User avatar
Mouthwash
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 156
Joined: 22 May 2017

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 08:37

FastFourierTransform wrote:
Mouthwash, we have talked about this in this thread long before (and also in the Work in progress thread):


FastFourierTransform:Source of the post I've just saw the precession of Mercury's perihelion. It's beautifull. But the problem is that it uses the DE436 theory that goes from the year 1550 to the year 2560. After that it imediatelly stops. If VSOP87 is also implemented and has unlimited timespan, why we can't see further evolution of Mercury's orbit?


FastFourierTransform:Source of the post Precession of Mercury's perihelion: I saw it in SE and looks great, but only occurs from the year 1550 to the 2560. Considering this is a more or less periodic phenomena could you make the timespan for the precession bigger? In that way we could see further evolution of Mercury's orbit. It's a very small angle now and If one has to explain it to people they are not going to clearly see it if it is not with longer duration.


SpaceEngineer:Source of the post JPL ephemeris does not calculate that value directly, so it cannot be extrapolated above the end points of the simulation.


Ohhh, so it only shows the change for the period of time it's been recorded. What I saw before must have been a bug, because I definitely saw full rotations (it only showed at the two or three fastest speeds).
Last edited by Mouthwash on 27 Nov 2017 20:34, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
longname
Space Tourist
Space Tourist
Posts: 39
Joined: 13 Apr 2017
Location: ∞/The Multiverse/The Universe/Local Cluster/The Milky Way/Orion Arm/Sol System/Earth-Moon/Earth/UK

Patch 0.9.8.0e

22 Nov 2017 12:39

Black hole shaders broken
Attachments
scr00003.jpg
Previously as "connorneal2005"
"I am a futurist. I don't want to believe humans won't become futuristic." - Me
 
User avatar
SpacePioneer
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 12 May 2017
Contact:

Patch 0.9.8.0e

26 Nov 2017 23:27

longname wrote:
Black hole shaders broken

Nah, it's just your computer screen cracking from the stress of being so near a black hole.
(joke, please have mercy on me)
Search the skies for a new home
As the old one burns
In ashen skies and firey night
The void my only savior
I, am the lone, space pioneer.
 
User avatar
Mouthwash
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 156
Joined: 22 May 2017

Patch 0.9.8.0e

05 Dec 2017 15:36

Oh, the black square around your monitor? I'm getting that too.
 
User avatar
SpaceEngineer
Author of SpaceEngine
Author of SpaceEngine
Topic Author
Posts: 505
Joined: 17 May 2016
Location: Saint-Petersburg
Contact:

Patch 0.9.8.0e

06 Dec 2017 03:57

The fix for wrong Saturn rotation period (4h) is easy:

- extract SolarSys.sc from <SE folder>/data/catalogs/Catalogs0980.pak: it must be copied to this path:
<SE folder>/data/catalogs/planets/SolarSys.sc
- open it with notepad, find Saturn script, find RotationModel "IAU", and replace this line
RotationRate 1810.7939024 // degrees/day
with this one:
RotationRate 810.7939024 // degrees/day

It was just a minor typo.
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest