Page 24 of 97

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 07:41
by Teterrimo
SpaceEngineer wrote:
Salvo wrote:
Source of the post Whaat? This are huge news! Did you already start working on it or it is such an easy implementation that it can be ready in just a month? 

It could take less than a week, there are plenty of free astronomical code libraries exist for this.

Good good, i thought was like that ;) I hope to see the update very soon !

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 11:39
by Quarior
It is planned for object and spacecraft/module can have a animated texture gif like a advertisement, traffic lights or other utilization ?
Also, the new class will be obsolete systems catalogs actual or it is compatible ?

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 14:28
by SpaceEngineer
Old classes could be useful in scripts, for a backward compatibility. Engine can easily automatically translate old classes to the new ones, for example desert -> desertic rocky terra.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 14:41
by Quarior
SpaceEngineer wrote:
Old classes could be useful in scripts, for a backward compatibility. Engine can easily automatically translate old classes to the new ones, for example desert -> desertic rocky terra.

Nice, old catalogs are compatible. Thanks for this information.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 14:58
by SpaceEngineer
News about development now will be in a form of blog. This thread is for discussion.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 15:11
by Druidpc
Fireinthehole wrote:
Druidpc wrote:
Do we have an estimated release date for this update? I'm hyped!

No.
Quarior wrote:
SpaceEngineer wrote:
Source of the post I planning to implement VSOP87/DE403 soon, and maybe release a quick patch for 0.980 with this feature only. Before the total solar eclipse in August.

Nice but when and where total solar eclipse in August ?

21st of August, visible in (only) the mainland USA.

Thanks. I'm kinda let down.  :(

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 16:14
by PlutonianEmpire
The VSOP87 mechanics, do they include the gradual slowing of the Earth's rotation from the moon's tidal influences? For example, I manually calculated the Earth's new RotationPeriod to he 23.9347254 for my addon set 51 thousand years into the future. Would the Earth have a similar RotationPeriod witu VSOP87 after setting the game time to that date?

Edit:
SpaceEngineer wrote:
News about development now will be in a form of blog. This thread is for discussion.

Maybe one way to filter barycenters from the SS explorer would be to exclude barycenter points that go below a planet's surface for any amount of time (maybe radius + bumpheight for example) from being classified as a binary?

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 16:37
by HarbingerDawn
PlutonianEmpire wrote:
Source of the post Maybe one way to filter barycenters from the SS explorer would be to exclude barycenter points that go below a planet's surface for any amount of time (maybe radius + bumpheight for example) from being classified as a binary?

No, mass ratio is the appropriate way to do this, otherwise Sun-Jupiter must be classed as binary.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 17:25
by problemecium
The Sun's and Jupiter's barycenter is outside the Sun? I never would have guessed considering their relative masses o_O

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 19:04
by HarbingerDawn
problemecium wrote:
The Sun's and Jupiter's barycenter is outside the Sun? I never would have guessed considering their relative masses o_O

Because you forget how far apart they are. Barycenter location is determined by a combination of mass ratio AND distance. This is why barycenter location alone is useless. Any pair of objects can have a barycenter located in open space if they're far enough apart.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 24 Jul 2017 20:02
by kham132
Will there be an option to switch between the new and old classification system?

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 25 Jul 2017 02:05
by XBrain130
tbh I don't mind Earth and Moon being classified as a binary in SE, after all they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets, plus they looks cool tegether in the system browser :)

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 25 Jul 2017 04:00
by HarbingerDawn
XBrain130 wrote:
Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets

Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 25 Jul 2017 04:19
by XBrain130
HarbingerDawn wrote:
XBrain130 wrote:
Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets

Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?

I'm not saying that, I don't actually consider them a binary planet. I was just saying that I wouldn't mind.

Work progress - 0.9.8.1

Posted: 25 Jul 2017 04:50
by Fireinthehole
HarbingerDawn wrote:
XBrain130 wrote:
Source of the post they still have the closest mass ratio of the major planets

Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?

Plus their barycenter is located within earth.