Good good, i thought was like that I hope to see the update very soon !
Good good, i thought was like that I hope to see the update very soon !
Nice, old catalogs are compatible. Thanks for this information.Old classes could be useful in scripts, for a backward compatibility. Engine can easily automatically translate old classes to the new ones, for example desert -> desertic rocky terra.
No.Do we have an estimated release date for this update? I'm hyped!21st of August, visible in (only) the mainland USA.
Thanks. I'm kinda let down.
Maybe one way to filter barycenters from the SS explorer would be to exclude barycenter points that go below a planet's surface for any amount of time (maybe radius + bumpheight for example) from being classified as a binary?News about development now will be in a form of blog. This thread is for discussion.
No, mass ratio is the appropriate way to do this, otherwise Sun-Jupiter must be classed as binary.
Because you forget how far apart they are. Barycenter location is determined by a combination of mass ratio AND distance. This is why barycenter location alone is useless. Any pair of objects can have a barycenter located in open space if they're far enough apart.The Sun's and Jupiter's barycenter is outside the Sun? I never would have guessed considering their relative masses o_O
Just because they're the closest doesn't mean they're close enough to be classed as binary. Earth is nearly two orders of magnitude more massive than the Moon. Do you really think they should be binary?
I'm not saying that, I don't actually consider them a binary planet. I was just saying that I wouldn't mind.
Plus their barycenter is located within earth.