HarbingerDawn wrote:I wrote a blog post about some of the program work I've done for 0.9.9.0 so far: http://spaceengine.org/news/blog171109/
I also added another engine effect group tied to the warp drive, so it is now possible to add engine exhaust effects to warp engines/hyperdrives/etc
Zoppadoppa wrote:Source of the post In regards to the eccentricity and changes to variations in orbital distances, does this mean we should see more diverse star system architectures in general?
Zoppadoppa wrote:Source of the post Is there any procedure associated with orbital placement or is it just random?
Andromeda wrote:Are you planning to add procedural and/or raymarched galaxy models in the next version?
tRetro-Visor wrote:Source of the post Since you've addressed orbits, have you tried adjusting gas / ice giants's numbers of moons to be tied with the distance to its parent star? For example, Uranus and Neptune have moons very far away from them because they're far away from the sun. That should be taken in consideration because I've seen multiple hot gas giants close to their parent stars with lots of moons
zhar22 wrote:Source of the post can we create scripts to change planets atmosphere and parameters, 3d model presence and locations over time?
Mosfet wrote:Andromeda wrote:Are you planning to add procedural and/or raymarched galaxy models in the next version?
In August SpaceEngineer said that they didn't even start working on galaxies, most likely it will be tackled in future releases.
Andromeda wrote:Source of the post In September he said it would take a month to finish, and it's been two months since then.