Ultimate space simulation software

 
User avatar
N0B0DY
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 160
Joined: 09 Dec 2016

A very PC discussion

06 Nov 2018 10:00

vlad01 wrote:
no but you can cook your steaks on a GTX 580!  The way it's meant to be grilled!  Jensen said so him self.

I remember getting 2 580s (used) back in late ~ 2013 in order to SLI them. I think the manufacturer was Gainward or something similar. The 1st arrived with its heatsink detached from the PCB - I tried returning it to the seller but he wasn't willing to accept the return. I tried to stick the heatsink with various methods to the PCB and the 580 massive chip but all failed. In the end I used thick rubber to keep it in contact with the chip. But in a few days I started experiencing freezes and artifacts. Ans a bad smell... the 1st GTX 580 had RIP. In a few months the same symptoms appeared and the 2nd GPU RIP as well. Lesson: Never buy 2nd hand GPUs especially if they are meant to be grilled. I grilled them well..
 
User avatar
HarbingerDawn
SE Team Member
SE Team Member
Posts: 486
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Location: CT, USA
Contact:

A very PC discussion

06 Nov 2018 10:59

Second hand GPUs can be ok, you just have to be careful about it. Make sure you get good images of the card so you can see if there is any visible damage. Get some information about the card's usage history. And make sure that the model of card you get is a good one, and likely to be in good shape even after a lot of use. Of course, there is no guarantee that the information the seller provides is accurate, but you will have a better chance of getting a good product this way than just getting something from a random listing.

I got my MSI 1080 Ti Gaming X used from ebay and it's in great shape, and even came with all of the original packaging. My last GPU was also used (from DoctorOfSpace), and the one before that was refurbished by the manufacturer, and all were great cards that are still working to this day. I haven't bought a brand new retail GPU for myself since 2012.

But of course, these were Maxwell and Pascal GPUs, not that Fermi rubbish :P
Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.8 GHz, 32 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB VRAM
Posts on old forum: 8717
 
vlad01
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 189
Joined: 02 May 2018

A very PC discussion

06 Nov 2018 17:44

Yeah I have had little luck with used GPU.  Most issues I have had was broken interconnects in the die package so cards would only work when heated (expansion allowed micro bumps to contact again)

depending on the generation and model some were susceptible to a limited amount of heat cycles and fail.

I had this very problem with a used 6800 Ultra I got from the US last year for a retro PC I wanted to built. Card cost me about $200 landed as they are hard to get in AGP and are collectable now.

Stopped working in winter. I found I had to preheat the die to get it to fire up and run without a fan to maintain operation, as soon as it cooled down it stopped.

I did have good luck with quadro cards and soft modding to geforce via driver straps and bit masks. I found the quadros to be manufactured at a different fab and their silicon is highly binned too as they over clock far beyond geforce variants with lower voltages. They are just built for longevity and reliability over the consumer geforce and they have not let me down as a used card. The drivers are up to date and supported 10 years min after release so you know they back the pro card. You'd want them to for the multi $k price tag on them lol.

This whole modding them and what not only applies to pre 07ish cards before pro and consumer drastically parted in design, before that quadro were just a top quality and binned geforce equvilant.

As for used cards now. Pascal and generally any AMD card from Fiji to now should be no probs as they have show next to no long term failures.

Anything from 2010 and prior is hit and miss with failures even when new common enough for concern.

It's looking that the new 20 series is showing signs of failures.
 
vlad01
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 189
Joined: 02 May 2018

A very PC discussion

12 Nov 2018 01:51

I just attached a power meter to me PC to see how much power it uses under certain loads. 

It's an FX 8320 OC from stock 3.5 base and 4 turbo to 4.1base and 4.5 turbo.

GPU is a evga GTX 980 classified stock 1417mhz and I got a very mediocre OC to 1467.

This is were things get interesting.

idle total power is about 160W

CPU full load under prime95 or similar This is where I expected power to go out the window given what people say about FX CPUs
Total load 260W. Not as much as I expected.

SE CPU and GPU load,  peaked 410W averaged 350W

GPU being maxwell was praised as efficient compared to the AMD offerings. This GPU has a TDP 175W

Furmark a whopping 550W!! GPU only load test. :shock:  With in 10 sec my PSU fan roared up like it was taking off.  Its a 850W unit so it was getting a work out.

Sometimes testing yourself is an eye opener when you take specs and general consensus as a guide.

I was doing this test to get an idea where a hypothetical Vega and Ryzen based system would compared to this in power and thermals.  Honestly I thing Vega would be a good upgrade power consumption wise after seeing this lol.
 
User avatar
HarbingerDawn
SE Team Member
SE Team Member
Posts: 486
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Location: CT, USA
Contact:

A very PC discussion

12 Nov 2018 02:36

Furmark is a power virus and isn't at all representative of the "normal" maximum power usage of a GPU. The whole purpose of the program is to push heat generation to absurd levels so the user can assess cooling performance.

Also, if you're measuring the input power to your PC (measuring "from the wall"), the numbers will be higher than what you would expect, since you have to account for the inefficiency of the PSU converting AC to DC (depending on the power supply, it could be somewhere in the range of 75-95% during medium to high load).

I have a GTX 1080 Ti and a significantly overclocked Ryzen 1700, and even when using Furmark and Prime95 together, using maximum power use settings, I still only draw about 650 watts of power from the wall, which means the PSU is outputting something like 570 watts (I have a 650 watt PSU, and it had no problem with that load).
Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.8 GHz, 32 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, GTX 1080 Ti 11 GB VRAM
Posts on old forum: 8717
 
vlad01
Explorer
Explorer
Posts: 189
Joined: 02 May 2018

A very PC discussion

12 Nov 2018 04:09

yeah I get that, but my point is how insane the power usage of the maxwell are compared to anything I had prior and it's rated tdp. I always thought they were really low power GPUs.

My 3 way SLI gtx 9800s in my previous system only totaled 390w on furmark.  I recall they had around 140w ? tdp for those.

Had a google on it and it does seem maxwell out runs it's rated power spec where in comparison pascal seems to stick to the rating pretty close.  It might be the way they boost or perhaps they changed how they rate their tdp ? maybe at their stock base clock or something.

Also it's best to test cpu and gpu separate as when the cpu is loaded it can't push the draw calls to the gpu in order to load the gpu fully.  When I run both furmark just stutters and it never leaves 2D clocks (135Mhz) and my usage is only 250w, less than just the CPU test alone which is because one thread is trying to do draw calls and leaves only 7 threads properly loaded.

The best way to measure without a current clamp on the PCIe cables and EPS 12V cables it to take the idle and assume -20% is the system and board, remainder is then half  gpu idle and have is the CPU. Then you can get a good educated calculation on each part.

so if I get 160 then about 130 is gpu+cpu.  So if my total is 550w for gpu only then I can take about 65w away, maybe make it 100W since it's doing draw calls.

So lets say 450W is the GPU then x by 0.85 for a typical higher end PSU as I have that gives about 382w actual at the GPU. That is still huge for something spec'd at 175w. So it must because the way it boosts.  Since mine is water cooled it never goes below full boost clocks + my tiny OC , in fact I have never seen the base clock unless it is only loaded 10-15% when CPU staved or application limited.
 
Harge
Observer
Observer
Posts: 6
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Location: South Pole

A very PC discussion

13 Nov 2018 13:53

What is your personal history of computers?
I knew I was an idiot in the past, I have toned down since then.
 
A-L-E-X
World Builder
World Builder
Posts: 849
Joined: 06 Mar 2017

A very PC discussion

13 Nov 2018 14:02

DoctorOfSpace wrote:
Gnargenox wrote:
Source of the post Does that need to be liquid cooled?

Nope.  Overclocked it to 2100Mhz and highest temp I have hit is 83°C.

Doc I finally got my new system.  It's nothing special but I got what I need to get to keep up with technology and also be able to upgrade in the future.
AMD RYZEN 2700X CPU
16 GB DDR4 DUAL CHANNEL MEMORY
500 GB SAMSUNG 970 EVO NVME SSD
1 TB TOSHIBA HDD
ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING MOTHERBOARD
850 WATT THERMALTAKE POWER SUPPLY
NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 1060 6 GB
CREATIVE RX 7.1 SOUND CARD

I also got myself a really nice fully per key customizable RGB 16.8 million color mechanical keyboard (Phantom 104 from Tecware.)  Total expenditure was around 2200.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest