A-L-E-X wrote:Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
Phunnie wrote:A-L-E-X wrote:Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
You only need luminance for RGB shots! You can't see the nebulosity with luminance as it doesn't cut out light pollution.
A-L-E-X wrote:Phunnie wrote:A-L-E-X wrote:Wow, narrowband really cuts through the light pollution! I think you also need to shoot a fourth one for the Luminance channel.
You only need luminance for RGB shots! You can't see the nebulosity with luminance as it doesn't cut out light pollution.
Oh, thats a good point, but I also heard you can use a regular light pollution filter or (better) an imaging light pollution filter (which corrects the white balance) for the luminance channel. I wonder if that does anything for narrowband imaging?
A-L-E-X wrote:omg and this is in a light polluted area?
There's a site called astrobin you should start a collection on there
A quiet, beautiful night under the stars in the North Cascades, with the Canon Rebel T3 and a tripod.
Phunnie wrote:Wow.
I really wish I had darker skies.
Phunnie wrote:Wow.
I really wish I had darker skies. That looks amazing. I've never even seen the milky way in my life. Darkest skies I've ever been under and actually looked up was somewhere around Bortle 6. I've been in a Bortle 1 area a few years ago during a camping trip, but I was too tired to look up and went straight to sleepMany regrets.
A quiet, beautiful night under the stars in the North Cascades, with the Canon Rebel T3 and a tripod.
Untracked? Holy ***.
There's a free tool to remove light pollution called Sequator, you should try it!