Thanks guys!

midtskogen wrote:

Source of the post Perfect, Harb!

What kind of lens and filter and exposure time did you use?

Canon EOS 600D
Tamron 200-500mm lens @ 500mm
Marumi 100k neutral density filter
1/1600 sec, f/8.0, ISO 100

Hey HarbringerDawn - you should submit that photo to the Astronomy magazine, they are always looking for stuff like that.

Sharing the ones I've taken in the last few month. Previous ones aren't that great


The Moon
586 Stacked Images / "True Color" in Photoshop

EDIT: Before and After



Mars at Opposition (July 27, 2018)


Jupiter and its Moons. 2 Combined Images at different ISO and exposure settings


Saturn



The Milky Way as seen from Lota, Chile. 20s of exposure

You are a lucky astronomer - whenever I go out, all I see is pure white from the wildfire smoke. Its like a scene of of The Mist

First month with telescope:

Milky Way and Mars:


Moon:



Camera : Canon 600D
Telescope : SkyWatcher 70/900 Eq1

Lujo, I really love that Milky Way/Mars shot!

Some nice aurora on northern Norway tonight.  Here's a clip from one of the cameras in our meteor network:

A combined view (the cameras don't completely fill the sky):

midtskogen wrote:

Source of the post (the cameras don't completely fill the sky)

The plight of astronomers and astrophotographers everywhere .

midtskogen, I got a notification from my aurora app, but I was too tired to walk outside and have a look. Seems I missed something really cool.

Excellent shot!

Stellarator wrote:

Source of the post The plight of astronomers and astrophotographers everywhere

It's a setup of four cameras, one will be replaced with a better one, and if my calculations are correct, the cameras will then combined cover the entire sky, effectively giving a 10 megapixel view of the sky recording up to 30 fps.  15 fps, which was the setting that night, seems to be a good compromise, though.

midtskogen wrote:

Stellarator wrote:

Source of the post The plight of astronomers and astrophotographers everywhere

It's a setup of four cameras, one will be replaced with a better one, and if my calculations are correct, the cameras will then combined cover the entire sky, effectively giving a 10 megapixel view of the sky recording up to 30 fps.  15 fps, which was the setting that night, seems to be a good compromise, though.

Nice. Be sure to share some more of your work!