8147 What shadders you using? for that screenshot i didnt use any shader, thats the work of the beta version 0981 where you can change some settings like reshade. the problem is i would like to increase the detail of my nebulae. well i could but the sprites would increase and performance would be r...

N0B0DY wrote:

Qr Bbpost Can't wait to finish work and go home to download it! Looks like a gem! Probably your best one IMO

Thank you!

spaceguy: 8118 Whenever I install the addon, it puts all the new model files in the addon folder thats because there are codes in the model file which are automatically updated by SE so it needs to extract it. 8118 such as the Eskimo nebula but that may be more related to graphic issues. I did not ...

8109 But maybe this is also due to my graphics card. nope its not your graphic card, well i put it in the more nebulae pak file so this shouldnt happen now  atleast i could do some fixes for the other nebulae too, btw thanks for telling me i wouldnt have seen it else :D. here is the download: more_...

I finished with the cats eye nebula and would like to share it :
You can download it here:

It has a "best i can do" 3d look and now imagine this with the new nebula method:

spaceguy, install my addon and search for red spider nebula if you can find it, it works.
i tested it on a clean install and it worked, are you using an older version of spaceengine?

spaceguy wrote:

Qr Bbpost I remove the cache folder and add this

yea thats all you have to do then it should work,
if you mean that you cant see the new cats eye nebula, thats because its not added right now.

I worked further on the cats eye nebula its still wip:

DoctorOfSpace wrote:

I see some minor differences Bambusman, mainly apparent size of certain features on the surface and a slight difference in surface lighting. 

oh yes i see, at first i thought there were problems with the color or the whole look.

here is one with mars, i dont see anything diffrent?
normal fov:

low fov:

6272 thats the work of reshade, this is what it looks without it: The non Reshade image still looks strange to me.  Are you using a low fov or some other trick for it?  Not saying it looks bad, just something looks different. How does Earth look with your Reshade? hmm thats interesting, what excact...

DoctorOfSpace wrote:

Qr Bbpost Bambusman, your images look heavily processed.

thats the work of reshade, this is what it looks without it:

generally all planets and moons look like a view through the telescope or camera.

Bambusman , After some background substraction this is what I got: http://forum.spaceengine.org/download/file.php?mode=view&id=2844 I still need a lot of works (and more images to stack). this looks pretty good already! did you edit a tiff or jpg file, also whats the original resolution of this...