another small attempt

halowraith1 wrote:

has anyone got any tips on making star systems in a different galaxy? the slightest of errors in the RA/D puts the system off by millions of light years.

and thats exactly why we cant place stars any farther than the magellanic clouds, SE isnt accurate enough at such distances yet

LonesomeAstronaut wrote:

Qr Bbpost Stargate

DoctorOfSpace has the Daedalus and the Prometeus, much recommended: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=67

LonesomeAstronaut wrote:

Qr Bbpost EVE Online

Ettore_Bilbo: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=65

I am trying to work on a couple ships. I sound some really good 3d models and resources but I am pretty new to this.. Is it possible to import real models into the SE ship editor, or do I need a separate program? And if so where do I go from there? Its a lot to figure out. Could someone please answ...

aFinapple wrote:

Qr Bbpost It does not have a texture

its normal, currently water is rendered simply as a blue-hued transparent layer with basic ripple animation

aFinapple wrote:

Qr Bbpost disappears whenever I get close enough

it doesn't, you're simply diving into it

17125 massive stars always being 300 solar masses The problem is that 300 solar masses is already double the currently theorized limit for newborn stars in real life, and roughly the same as the (very-uncertainly estimated) record holder (R136a1 at 315, but it could be as much as 50 units lower ), ...

My favorite ships to use are by far the BC-302 Prometheus and BC-303 Daedalus from Stargate, coded by Doc

scruffyhightops wrote:

Qr Bbpost I would be more interested in seeing models of things like the ISS, or code to enable adding stations in orbit.

That is ready for the next version.

17026 When using the System Chart, why are planets' distance not in scale? This had me make me facepalm so hard - because distances are to scale when you're not using System Chart! What kind of question is that?? 17038 How about moons for other moons? It has been brought up before, and we think tha...

Are there any known celestial bodies that can be (A) destroyed, or (B) have some part of themselves (atmosphere, solid layer) destroyed by a chain reaction? This occurred to me as I was reading about the theory that Saturn might be turned into a giant fireball by the Cassini probe's plutonium fuel....

I utterly agree with Harbinger's last post, but I absolutely have to say a last thing Mouthwash: 16357 I can't comment on his actual scientific work, but as a science communicator and philosopher I strongly dislike him. I really, really hope I then misunderstood this sentence as "I am [these] a...

16389 But he's the patron god of every smug charlatan peddling nonsense like the food pyramid or evolutionary psychology. ...?! Please enlighten me about how can define the food pyramid like that with a straight face. 16389 If many pseudoscientists adore you, you have probably done something wrong ...

"sounds like an hilarious and deliberately forged meaning. A basic understanding of what you are going to vote and the consequences of your choice for others in years to come should be well into possibilities of educated people, moreover they have the right to be informed and it's their duty t...

16370 he also popularized an egotistical, elitist version of it: "Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works." There's a straight path leading from this to modern managerial liberalism and proposals for epistocracy ....

16318 "I conclude therefore that this star [supernova] is not some kind of comet or a fiery meteor, but that it is a star shining in the firmament itself - one that has never previously been seen before our time, in any age since the beginning of the world." - Tycho Brahe I thought the po...